Four Day Work Week
Employees happier, healthier and higher-performing?
The four-day workweek is trending again, and this time it comes with charts. A new six-month, six-country study says that shaving off a day (without reducing pay) leads to less burnout, better mental health, and happier employees. Sounds like a win all around. But before we start mandating three-day weekends for everyone, let’s pull back and look at how we got here—and what might be missing from this conversation.
A hundred years ago, there was no “standard” workweek. Men were just returning from World War I. Many were leaving behind family farms and heading into towns and cities, where big industry—railroads, coal, steel, and early manufacturing—offered steady pay but total control. The work schedule? Whatever the employer said it was. Storefront business owners worked when customers could show up. There were no boundaries, no weekends, and no PTO. Work was work. And there were few complaints about stress and anxiety.
Then came World War II and the postwar corporate era—what some call the “man in the gray flannel suit” generation. Things began to stabilize: the five-day, 40-hour week became common across both blue- and white-collar jobs. Work hours were regular, predictable, and largely unquestioned. That model held strong through the ’60s, ’70s, and well into the ’90s.
But then high-tech startups started pushing back. They didn’t care how many hours you worked—as long as you delivered. Productivity began to matter more than presence. This was also the era when “burnout” entered the lexicon. Was it new? Doubtful. But it finally became something we talked about.
Now fast forward to the present day. The pandemic sent millions of workers into remote limbo—disconnected from coworkers, routines, and any clear distinction between “work” and “life.” Unsurprisingly, stress soared. But here’s a question we don’t ask enough: Was the stress from the job—or from not knowing how to manage the job without supervision?
I’ll go a step further: burnout, as it’s often discussed today, is a convenient label. It lets us blame work when, in many cases, we haven’t built the habits or perspective to navigate it well. That’s not to say real overwork doesn’t happen—but feeling stressed because a boss expects deliverables? That’s not burnout. That’s work. It has expectations.
And here’s where we hit a generational wall. Many younger workers—Gen Y, Z, and the upcoming Gen Alpha—have been taught to value flexibility, balance, and purpose. Fine values. But many also lack any lived experience in how value is actually created—or what it means to be paid for outcomes, not time. If no one ever taught them what work is, is it any surprise that stress rises the moment a manager sets a deadline?
So yes, a four-day workweek might reduce stress. But maybe we should also be talking about skills—how to structure your time, how to prioritize, how to meet expectations, how to work independently. Maybe we should stop treating “burnout” as a purely external condition and start asking where personal agency fits into the equation.
This is a conversation we should be having. And if this new study helps open that door—even if unintentionally—then great. Just don’t mistake fewer days for more value. That part still has to be earned.
Read the original article
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-02295-2?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Read a counter argument
https://www.forbes.com/sites/benjaminlaker/2024/10/03/the-hidden-costs-of-the-4-day-workweek-and-its-true-impact/
A subscription may be required. If so, send me a note and I will email the article to you.
Facebook Twitter Youtube
